Перейти в головне навігаційне меню Перейти до головного Перейти на нижній колонтитул сайту

2020: Pedagogical Concept and its Features, Social Work and Linguology (1st edition)

Gender biases of foster parent applicants: old new stereotypes?

DOI
https://doi.org/10.36074/pcaifswal.ed-1.06
Опубліковано
2020-08-30

Анотація

The process of reforming the state care system for orphans and children deprived of parental care requires research to study the gender aspects of foster parenthood, which affect the distribution of roles in the private family sphere, strategies for raising orphans and children deprived of parental care. The article covers the problem of gender stereotypes of candidates for foster parents, which determine their vision of social and psychological characteristics and expectations of women and men. The results of the study of femininity and masculinity stereotypes using the Bem Sex-Role Inventory and the assessment of ambivalent sexism in the attitudes toward women and men using a short version of the methodology of P. Glick and S. Fiske. It is established that candidates for foster parents demonstrate a greater extent of benevolent rather than hostile sexism and describe a generalized image of women and men as androgynous individuals, but almost a third of respondents' responses concerning women show high indicators on the femininity scale, and concerning men - on the masculinity scale. High levels of hostility to feminism, especially among women, have been reported. Author emphasizes the importance of introducing special training programs for candidates for foster parents in order to disseminate attitudes that correspond to contemporary views of egalitarian family patterns.

Посилання

  1. Shevchenko T., Poliakova O. (2019). Sotsialno-pedahohichni umovy formuvannia hendernoi kompetentnosti batkiv-vykhovateliv dytiachykh budynkiv simeinoho typu. Pedahohichni nauky: teoriia, istoriia, innovatsiini tekhnolohii, (90:6), 307-325. [In Ukrainian].
  2. Yaroshenko, A.A. (2020). Vid stereotypiv do riznomanittia: hendernyi analiz prohramy pidhotovky zamisnykh batkiv. Path of Science, (6:6), 7001-7016. [In Ukrainian].
  3. Usynovlennia: realii ta tendentsii: rezultaty sotsiolohichnykh doslidzhen (2009). Kyiv: Feniks. [In Ukrainian].
  4. Bem, S.L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, (42:2), 155-162.
  5. Kletsina, I.S. (2003). Izuchenie gendernykh kharakteristik lichnosti metodom psikhologicheskoy samodiagnostiki. Praktikum po gendernoy psikhologii, 259-297. [In Russian].
  6. Glick, P., Fiske, S. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating Hostile and Benevolent Sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, (70:3), 491-512.
  7. Rollero, C., Glick, P., Tartaglia, S. (2014). Psychometric Properties of Short Versions of the Ambivalent Sexism Іnventory and Ambivalence Toward Men Inventory. TPM – Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, (21:2), 149-159.
  8. Zizevskaya, E.S., Shchukina, M.A. (2019). Zarubezhnye metodiki psikhologicheskoy diagnostiki seksizma. Sovremennaya zarubezhnaya psikhologiya, (8:3), 68-77. [In Russian].
  9. Bem, S. (2004). Linzy gendera: Transformatsiya vzglyadov na problemu neravenstva polov. Moskva: Rossiyskaya politicheskaya entsiklopediya. [In Russian].
  10. Yaroshenko, A.A., Semigina, T.V. (2019). Feministychna sotsialna robota yak profesiine investuvannia v zhinochu solidarnist. Visnyk Akademii pratsi, sotsialnykh vidnosyn i turyzmu, (1), 13-29. [In Ukrainian].
  11. Suchasne rozuminnia maskulinnosti: stavlennia cholovikiv do hendernykh stereotypiv i nasylstva shchodo zhinok (2018). Kyiv. [In Ukrainian].