Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

2021: Society and Universum Sciences: Dynamics and Development (1st edition)

The influence of modern means of communication on intergenerational communication and the formation of new family ties

DOI
https://doi.org/10.36074/sausdad.ed-1.04
Published
2022-08-26

Abstract

Family relations and family communication - are a complex socio-psychological fabric, which has always been the quintessence of culture, religion, psychology, economic and political relationships, dependent on migration and many others. The impact of technology has changed it. The purpose of this work is to study the impact of Internet communications on intergenerational communication and the formation of new family ties in society. There is exploratory-descriptive research which as well preliminary and based theoretical part for quantitative methodological design. Here we form hipoteses that technologies make it possible to create strong ties in groups of the grandfather-grandson / grandmother-granddaughter type, that is, in a generation, which for a long time was one of the most necessary elements of communication for the stability of nuclear families.

References

  1. Charles B. Nam (2004), “The Concept of The Family: Demographic and Genealogical Perspectives”, Center for Demography and Population Health, Florida State University
  2. Smith, James E. (1987). "The Computer Simulation of Kin Sets and Kin Counts," in Bongaarts, John, Thomas K. Burch, and Kenneth W. Wachter, eds., Family Demography: Methods and Their Applications. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  3. Yumkina Ye.A. (2014) “Intra-family communication in spatio-temporal aspect”, ISBN 159.923.2 : 316.356.2
  4. Smith, Ken R., and Geraldine P. Mineau (2003). "Genealogical Records," in Demeny, Paul, and Geoffrey McNicholl, eds., Encyclopedia of Population. New York: Macmillan.
  5. Melford E. Spiro (1965), “A Typology of Social Structure and the Patterning of Social Institutions: A Cross-Cultural Study”, New Series, Vol. 67, No. 5, Part 1 (Oct., 1965), pp. 1097-1119 (23 pages)
  6. Aleti, T., Brennan, L. & Parker, L. (2015), “Family communication for the modern era: a typology”, Young Consumers, vol. 16, issue 4, pp. 367-384
  7. Eid, M., Langeheine, R., Diener, E. (2003). Comparing typological structures across cultures by multigroup latent class analysis: A primer. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34, 195–210
  8. Moos, R. H., Moos, B. S. (1976). A typology of family social environments. Family Process, 15, 357–371
  9. Jiwoo Lee, Martha Y. Kubik, Jayne A. Fulkerson, Nidhi Kohli, Ann E. Garwick (2019), “The Identification of Family Social Environment Typologies Using Latent Class Analysis: Implications for Future Family-Focused Research”, PMID: 31874588, Volume: 26 issue: 1, page(s): 26-37
  10. UN Women’s flagship report (2021), “Progress of the world’s women 2019–2020: Families in a changing world”, ISBN:978-1-63214-156-9
  11. Csikszentmihalyi M., Rochberg-Halton E. (1981), “The Meaning of Things: Domestic Symbols of the Self”. NY: Cambridge University Press.
  12. Yumkina Ye.A. (2014), “Socio-Psychological Criterions Of Family Lifestyle Typology”, Modern Research of Social Problems, №12(44)
  13. Nilova K. (2015) “Intergenerational intrafamily communication: social and psycholinguistic aspect”, Dissertation, "Bashkir State University" March 20, 2015
  14. Salikhova E., Nilova K., (2016) “Intrazone of the family communication: sociopsycholinguistic aspect”, International Academy of Science and Higher Education (IASHE), ISBN 978-1-909137-85-1
  15. Jensen E.W., James S.A., Boyce W.T., Hartnett S.A. (1983) “The family routines inventory: Development and validation” // Social Science and Medicine. Vol. 17 (4). 1983. pp. 201-211.
  16. Churchill S.L., Stoneman Z. (2004) “Correlates of family routines in Head Start families” // Early Childhood Research and Practice. 2004. № 6.
  17. Costa R.P. (2013) “Family rituals: Mapping the postmodern family through time, space and emotional” // Journal of Comparative Family Studies. Vol. 43. Issue 3. 2013. pp. 269-289.
  18. Timashevа L. (2017) “Features Of Communication In Modern Family”, Department of Conflictology and Organizational Psychology, Astrakhan State University
  19. Blinn-Pike, L. (2009). Technology and the family: An overview from the 1980’s to the present. Marriage & Family Review, 45, 567–575.
  20. Agafonov G. (2017) “Phenomenology Of The Social And Psychological Barriers In Intergenerational Relationships Of The Family”, Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia
  21. Miklyaeva A.V. (2014), “Personality as a subject of inter-age relations: socio-psychological analysis” // Modern problems of science and education. 2014. №3 P.637.
  22. Doreva E. A., Koroleva E. M. (2015) ‘Factors of preservation and completion (disintegration) of close relationships: a review modern psychological research” // Bulletin KSU Nekrasova: Pedagogy. Psychology. Social work. Juvenology. Sociokinetics. 2015. No. 4 S.112-116.
  23. Salikhova E., Nilova K. (2013) “Particularities Infamily Verbal Contacts Through Generation: Grandmothers-Grandfather Vs Grandchildren”, Issn 1991-5497. The World Of Science, Culture, Education. No. 1 (38) 2013.
  24. Kitzmann K.M., Dalton 3rd. W.T., Stanley C.M., Beech B.M., Reeves T.P., Buscemi J., Egli C.J., Midgett, E.L. (2010) “Lifestyle interventions for youth who are overweight: a meta-analytic review” // Health psychology: official journal of the Division of Health Psychology. American
  25. Psychological Association. 2010. Vol. 29 (1). pp. 91-101.
  26. Patrick H., Hennessy E., McSpadden K., Oh A. (2013) “Parenting styles and practices in children’s obesogenic behaviors: Scientific gaps and future research directions” // Childhood Obesity. Vol. 9 (SUPPL.1). 2013. pp. 73-86.
  27. Wolin S.J., Bennett L.A. (1984) ‘Family rituals” // Family Process. Vol. 23 (3). 1984. pp. 401-420.
  28. Efremova A. (2017) "Internet Communication As A Means Of Society Mobilization", International Student Scientific Bulletin. - 2017. - No. 1
  29. Volodina O.V., Agababyan S.R. (2021) “The role and place of emoticons in modern intercultural Internet communication” // Modern scientist. 2021. No. 3. S. 262-266.
  30. Ivanova M.V., Klushina N.I. (2021) “Creative possibilities of language in Internet communication” // Bulletin of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research. Humanities and social sciences. 2021. No. 1 (103). pp. 52-62.
  31. Carvalho, J., Francisco, R., & Relvas, A. P. (2015). “Family functioning and information and communication technologies: How do they relate? A literature review”. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 99-108.
  32. Man Ping Wang, Joanna TW Chu, Kasisomayajula Viswanath, Alice Wan, Tai Hing Lam, and Sophia S Chan, (2015) “Using Information and Communication Technologies for Family Communication and Its Association With Family Well-Being in Hong Kong: FAMILY Project”,
  33. J Med Internet Res. 2015 Aug; 17(8): e207.
  34. Aponte R. (2009) “The communications revolution and its impact on the family: significant, growing, but skewed and limited in scope”, Marriage & Family Review. 2009 Oct 27; 45(6-8):576–586. doi:10.1080/01494920903396778
  35. Kim H, Kim G, Park H, Rice R. (2007) “Configurations of relationships in different media: FtF, email, instant messenger, mobile phone, and SMS”. J Comput Mediat Commun. 2007;12:1183–1207. doi: 10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00369
  36. Ramirez A, Broneck K. `IM me': instant messaging as relational maintenance and everyday communication. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 2009 Jul 31;26(2-3):291–314. doi: 10.1177/0265407509106719
  37. Quan-Haase, A. , Cothrel, J. , & Wellman, B. (2005). Instant messaging for collaboration: A case study of a high-tech firm. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication , 10. Retrieved August 14, 200
  38. Ramsey MA, Gentzler AL, Morey JN, Oberhauser AM, Westerman D. (2013) “College students' use of communication technology with parents: comparisons between two cohorts in 2009 and 2011”. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2013 Oct;16(10):747–52. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2012.0534
  39. Valkenburg PM, Peter J, Schouten AP. (2006) “Friend networking sites and their relationship