Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##

2023: Modern approaches to the development of relevant competencies in the socio-cultural environment

Subject-object determiners in the semantic aspect of the modern ukrainian language

DOI
https://doi.org/10.36074/madrcsce-monograph.2023.5
Published
2023-01-20

Abstract

In the content aspect of the sentence, as a communicative unit, the connection between language and thinking is clearly expressed. This causes, when studying the content aspect of the sentence, on the one hand, the appeal to the concepts of logic, and on the other hand, the correlation of linguistic categories with the facts of extralinguistic reality. The concept of the «substantive facet of the proposal is very broad». The content of the sentence not only reflects the connection of language to thinking and reality, but it also intersects and interacts with nominative, communicative, expressive, and other functions [Zaghnitko, 2014]. ...

References

  1. Batictić, T. (1972). Lokativ u savremenom srpskohrvatskom knjižęvnom jezik. Beograd: Naučno delo. 212 p. [in Serbian-Croatian].
  2. Bulakhovskyi, L.A. (1958). Pytannia syntaksysu prostoho rechennia v ukrainskii movi [The question of the syntax of a simple sentence in the Ukrainian language]. Kyyiv [in Ukrainian].
  3. Daneš, Fr. (1964). A three-level approach to syntax. Prague [in Czechoslovakia].
  4. Fries, Ch. (1959). The structure of English: An introduction to the construction of English sentences. London: Longmans, Green and Co. Vol. XI. 304 p.
  5. Ghrozjan, N.F. (2018). Fonovi determinanty v ukrajinsjkij movi [Background determinants in the Ukrainian language]. Fylologhycheskyj aspect – Philological aspect. №2(34). Р. 67–73 [in Ukrainian].
  6. İvanenko, Z.İ. (1978). Semantychna struktura pryimennykovykh konstruktsii [Semantic structure of prepositional structurestwo-syllable sentence]. Movoznavstvo – Language studies. № 3. P. 13–22 [in Ukrainian].
  7. İvanytska, N.L. (1986). Dvoskladne rechennia v ukraïnskii movi [Twosyllable sentence in the Ukrainian language]. Kyyiv: Vyshcha shkola. 166 p. [in Ukrainian].
  8. Melnychuk, O.S. (1972). Slovospoluchennia [Phrases]. Suchasna ukraïnska literaturna mova: Syntaksys – Modern Ukrainian literary language: syntax. Vol. 2. P. 51–117. Kyyiv: Naukova dumka [in Ukrainian].
  9. Mezhov, O.H. (1998). Sub׳iektni syntaksemy u strukturi prostoho rechennia [Subject syntaxes in the structure of a simple sentence] Extended abstract of candidateʹs thesis. Lutsk: VolynU [in Ukrainian].
  10. Mirchenko, M.V. (2001). Struktura syntaksychnykh katehorii [Structure of syntactic categories]. Extended abstract of candidateʹs thesis. Lutsk: VDU [in Ukrainian].
  11. Pashkivskyi, A.M. (1937). Funktsiï pryimennykiv u suchasnii ukraïnskii literaturnii movi [Functions of prepositions in modern Ukrainian literary language]. Movoznavstvo – Language studies. № 12. P. 37–65 [in Ukrainian].
  12. Pliushch, M.Ya. (1986). Katehoriia sub׳iekta i ob׳iekta v strukturi prostoho rechennia [Category of subject and object in the structure of a simple sentence]. Kyyiv: Vyshcha shkola. 175 p. [in Ukrainian].
  13. Rudenko, L.M. (1996). Obstavynna determinatsiia v strukturi tekstu (semantyko-syntaksychnyi i stylistychnyi aspekty) [Circumstantial determination in the structure of the text (semantic-syntactic and stylistic aspects)]. Kyyiv: Ukraïna-Vita. 213 p. [in Ukrainian].
  14. Rusanivskyi, V.M. (1983). Spivvidnoshennia semantychnoï i formalno-hramatychnoï struktury rechennia [Тhe relationship between the semantic and formal-grammatical structure of a sentence]. Semantyko-syntaksychna struktura rechennia – Semantic and syntactic structure of a sentence. Kyyiv: Naukova dumka. P. 99–125 [in Ukrainian].
  15. Rusanivskyi, V.M. (1988). Struktura leksychnoï i hramatychnoï semantyky [The structure of lexical and grammatical semantics]. Kyyiv: Naukova dumka. 236 p. [in Ukrainian].
  16. Selivanova, O.O. (2001). Kohnityvnyi aspekt kontrastyvnoï onomasiolohiï [Syntax of modern Ukrainian: problematic issues Cognitive aspects of contrastive onomasiology]. Movoznavstvo – Language studies. № 1. P. 71–77 [in Ukrainian].
  17. Shynkaruk, V.D. (2002). Kateghoriï modusu i dyktumu u strukturi rechennja [Categories of mode and dictum in the sentence structure]. Chernivci: Ruta. 272 p. [in Ukrainian].
  18. Slynko, İ.İ. (1980). Paradyhmatyka prostoho rechennia ukraïnskoï movy [Рaradigmatics of the first sentence of the Ukrainian language]. Movoznavstvo – Language studies. № 2. P. 92–93 [in Ukrainian].
  19. Slynko, İ.İ. (1985). Chy ye odnoskladni rechennia? [Are there monosyllabic sentences?]. Movoznavstvo – Language studies. № 4. P. 48–53 [in Ukrainian].
  20. Slynko, I.I., Huivaniuk, N.V., & Kobylianska, M.F. (1994). Syntaksys suchasnoi ukrainskoi movy: Problemni pytannia [Syntax of modern Ukrainian: problematic issues]. Kyyiv: Vyshcha shkola. 670 p. [in Ukrainian].
  21. Vintoniv, M.O., & Bajurova, M.Gh. (2020). Temporaljni determinanty u suchasnij ukrajinsjkij movi: struktura, funkcIji [Verbal government in the modern Ukrainian literary language: Word combinations with prefix-prepositional correlation]. Mizhnarodnyj filologhichnyj chasopys – International Philological Journal. № 4. P. 19–26 [in Ukrainian].
  22. Vykhovanets, I.R., (1992). Narysy z funktsionalnoho syntaksysu ukrainskoi movy [Аn essay on the functional syntax of the Ukrainian language]. Kyyiv: Naukova dumka. 224 p. [in Ukrainian].
  23. Zaghnitko, A.P. (2001). Teoretychna ghramatyka ukraïnsjkoï movy. Syntaksys [Theoretical grammar of the Ukrainian language Syntax]: Extended abstract of candidateʹs thesis. Donetsk: DonNU. 662 p. [in Ukrainian].
  24. Zaghnitko, A.P. (2014). Teoriia hramatyky i tekstu: monohrafiia [Theory of grammar and text: monograph]. Donetsk: DonNU. 480 p. [in Ukrainian].