Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##

2023: Modern approaches to the development of relevant competencies in the socio-cultural environment

Subjectness, activity, systemic approaches in the field of speech and language bilingual development research

DOI
https://doi.org/10.36074/madrcsce-monograph.2023.4
Published
2023-01-20

Abstract

Determining the place of scientific development and assessing its prospects involves an analysis of the formation of its immediate theoretical foundations. In the case when the object of study of psycholinguistic science is the development of bilingual speech and language ability, the researcher deals with the formation of a single complex system with interdependent parts and elements. The development of this object occurs as a systemic genesis, which means that the concentration of research interest on certain aspects of the development of speech and language, for example, on the development of only a second language (SL), cannot be fully justified, and bilingual ability is considered in the context of general speech and language development. In the history of psychology, the ability of a person to master the word, in the broadest sense of this ability, has been the subject of studies that have become classic. In the work of L.S. Vygotsky «Thinking and Speech», questions of the social nature of speech and questions of speech-thinking relations were especially singled out [Van der Veer, 2011]. Interpretation of speech through means of communication, its understanding from the standpoint of the teachings of Ivan Pavlov as the second signal system [Pavlov, 1983] was given by first applied behavior analytics such as Edward Chace Tolman. ...

References

  1. Birch, J. (2020). In search of the origins of consciousness. Acta biotheoretica. № 68(2). Р. 287–294.
  2. Dipamo, B., Job, R. (1991). A methodological review of studies of SALT (Suggestive-accelerative learning and teaching) techniques. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. № 7(2). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2284.
  3. Gliksman, L., Gardner, R., Smythe, P. (1982). The role of the integrative motive on students’ participation in the Frenсh classroom. The Canadian modern language review. № 38(4). Р. 625–647.
  4. Kharchenko, N. (2017). Listening in the paradigm of activity psycholinguistics. Science and Education: a New Dimension. V(125). Р. 37–40. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.31174/ SEND-HS2017-147V25-09.
  5. Maher, C. (2020). Experiment rather than define. Trends plant. sci. № 25(3). Р. 213–214.
  6. Pavlov, I. (1983). The Madrid speech of I. P. Pavlov. Revised version of T. N. Ushakova. European Psychologist. Vol. 1997(2). Р. 97–101. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1027/ 1016-9040.2.2.97.
  7. Rifkin, B. (1998). Gender representation in foreign language textbooks. The modern language journal. № 82(2). Р. 217–236.
  8. Rusalov, V. (2017). Functional systems theory and the activity-specific approach in psychological taxonomies. Phil. Trans. Royal Society. № 373. Retrieved from http://dx.doi. org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0166.
  9. Tyron, O. (2017). Psycholinguistic approach to the foreign language competence formation of future seafarers. Psychology. № 8(4). Р. 663-675. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.4236/ psych.2017.84043.
  10. Ushakova, N., Тrostynska, О., Kushnir, І. (2021). Formation and development of methodology of language training for foreign students of a classical university. Part 1. Teaching students of non-linguistic specialties. Teaching Languages at Higher Educational Establishments at the Present Stage. Intersubject Relations. № 38. Р. 205–235. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.26565/2073-4379-2021-38-14.
  11. Ushakova, T.N. (2000). Language emergence in infants. European Psychologist. № 5(4). Р. 285–292. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040.5.4.285.
  12. Van der Veer, R.; Yasnitsky, A. (2011). «Vygotsky in English: What Still Needs to Be Done». Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science. № 45(4). Р. 475–493. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-011-9172-9.
  13. Yanyan Bao, Shuzhen Liu (2021). The Influence of Affective Factors in Second Language Acquisition on Foreign Language Teaching. Open Journal of Social Sciences. № 9(3). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2021.93030.
  14. Zasiekina, L. (2007). Language and culture impact on individual intelligence. In: Challenging Tasks for Psycholinguistics in the New Century. J. Arabski, Ed. Katowice: University of Silesia. P. 256–262.
  15. Zhao, T., Zhu, Y., Tang H., Xie R., Zhu J. & Zhang J.H. (2019). Consciousness: New Concepts and Neural Networks. Front. Cell. Neurosci. № 302(13). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2019.00302.